7 posts
AI drafts test cases, code and bug summaries in seconds, which moves a tester's value from producing artifacts to judging them. Review AI output like a junior's work, refuse unverifiable claims, and show your judgment through a portfolio, outcome-based CV bullets and a yearly career check.
A senior QA engineer who tests everything equally leaves the risky areas thin. Score each area by impact times likelihood, test the top deepest, tell the PM in writing what gets only a smoke pass, and make every production escape leave a regression test behind.
Testers moving into automation usually stall by learning in the wrong order, not because coding is hard. Learn the language your suite uses, automate three flows from your own product, make your first PR a small test for a bug you found, and own an area by month six.
